He prefaces his argument with a couple of anecdotes from bloggers on their changing reading habits, as well as the findings of a University College London study titled "Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future" which suggests the emergence of new types of reading.
Fact and Fantasy ;  DeFrancis classifies Chinese as a logosyllabic writing system. Olds cited the potential benefits of computer software that specifically targets learning disabilitiesstating that among some neuroscientists there was a belief that neuroplasticity-based software was beneficial in improving receptive language disorders.
In discussing the mechanical clockCarr deliberates upon the benefits and losses that are characteristic of new technologies. Most responded in detail; concurring with the proposition "Carr was wrong: His blog is well worth reading regularly: Google does not make us stupid.
Kevin Kelly and Scott Esposito each offered alternate explanations for the apparent changes. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. To read the whole thing for yourself, please visit here.
Drawing parallels with transactive memory — a process whereby people remember things in relationships and groups — Ratliff mused that perhaps the web was "like a spouse who is around all the time, with a particular knack for factual memory of all varieties".
This article is about one skill that he believes is being eroded, that of reading: He acknowledges that his argument does not yet have the backing of long-term neurological and psychological studies.
As an afterthought, a essay by playwright Richard Foreman is excerpted for its lament of the waning of the "highly educated and articulate personality".
Here are a handful of the many interesting perspectives uncovered by the survey: There is no question that our habits are changing: And, academics often express the same concerns Carr doesin his Atlantic article.
On the other hand, the Internet is likely to be front-and-centre in any developments related to improvements in neuroscience and human cognition research. But, his own criticism is superficial and misses the humanizing impact of Web 2.
The Web is where we look for knowledge that usually exists not in final, authoritative, single-author text blocks but in the aggregate of wisdom from many sites.
Due to an increased reliance on the Internet, Worthen speculated that before long "the guy who remembers every fact about a topic may not be as valuable as the guy who knows how to find all of these facts and many others".
Like other critics, he sees change as loss and not as gain.
Thanks to Google, and other smart search engines, we are letting go of some of the behaviors that suited us better in a time of information scarcity, and embracing habits that work better in our new information environment. Email Last Updated Feb 23, According to Ben Worthen, a Wall Street Journal business technology blogger, the growing importance placed on the ability to access information instead of the capacity to recall information straight from memory would, in the long term, change the type of job skills that companies who are hiring new employees would find valuable.
He says "Once I was a scuba diver in the sea of words."Is the internet making us stupid?" I type. Press enter. Almost instantly, a raft of answers and articles on screen. It's an unsettling feeling that my first instinct – to Google my own stupidity – may be the root of my increasing daftness.
Nicholas Carr, the author of the Atlantic cover story “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, confronts this paradox in his new book, The Glass Cage: Automation and Us, analyzing the many contemporary fields in which software assists human cognition, from medical diagnostic aids to architectural modeling programs.
As its title suggests, the book also.
The faster we surf across the Web—the more links we click and pages we view—the more opportunities Google and other companies gain to collect information about us and to feed us advertisements.
Most of the proprietors of the commercial Internet have a financial stake in collecting the crumbs of data we leave behind as we flit from link to link—the. Essay on Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr - The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson.
The first of the many ideas conveyed in Carr’s article is that the brain is malleable like plastic. Is Google Making Us Stupid Essay 4 Words | 4 Pages. Is Google Making Us Stupid Nicholas Carr’s Atlantic Online article “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” discusses how the use of the computer affects our thought process.
Is Google Making Us Stupid? Nicholas Carr What the Internet is doing to our brains "Dave, stop. Stop, will you? Stop, Dave. there’s no evidence that they ever went back and actually read it.
The reading that is very different from the circuitry found in those of us whose written language employs an alphabet. The variations extend.Download