An analysis of the nature of man in society and the principles of a political process

Similarly, the Law of Gravity is a never-changing law of science. Therefore, it is generally believed that Political Science is not an exact science as it fails to observe uniformity.

Thus, society and individuals are bound by an intimate and harmonious bond and the conflicts between the two are apparent and momentary.

State of nature

It originated in India and later spread to East AsiaTibetCentral Asiaand Southeast Asiadeveloping new and syncretic traditions in these different regions. It could not be successful because the Governors of the concerned States started interfering unnecessarily in the workings of the governments.

Here the tension between individual and society is resolved in favor of plurality, of an aggregate of mutually disinterested individuals occupying the same space at the same time. This is the evolutionary theory of state.

Under compulsion he may play the role but he will resent it and come in conflict with the society producing tensions in him which in time may release them in sudden and unprecedented acting. The role of social life is clarified when we consider the process by which they develop in the life of the individual.

While Manu is considered to be the first political thinker of India and his famous book "Manusmriti" is regarded as the first book of law in India.

They can be the effects or results of immediately authorised decisions. A modicum of democratic value suggests that the individual should have full freedom to pursue his goals independently.

Nature of Society and its Relation with Individual

Every individual is the offspring of a social relationship established between man and woman. Under this heading we also study ancient political institutions and administrations so that we may have the knowledge of the systematic development of modern institutions.

Mostly, they are of collective or public nature. But "we can become", says Dr. Harold Laswell, a leading Political Scientist of the U. The question of the nature of society is closely connected with the question of the relationship of man and society. In the opinion of R. In many city-states there was popular sovereignty which could not function properly.

In a political system, several feedback processes operate at various levels. In dealing with the present it attempts to describe and classify existing political institutions and ideas. Therefore, the Politics of one country differs from that of the other because every country faces different problems at the same time.

He was also, record shows, interested in life sciences and extensively studied them. It is also called the scientific theory.

The scope of Political Science is determined by the inquiries that arise in connection with the State. Aristotle does not stop here. The State is imaginary and it is the Government that gives it a practical shape.

Society is universal and pervasive and has no defined boundary or assignable limits. It is described as a good, as an end in itself which is a shared end. Aristotle has emphasized upon education.

His concept of organic theory of state is also a powerful hint of totalitarianism. By nature he desires to live in society and follows the rules and regulations of the State.

It had become a welfare State. These inquiries may broadly be classed under the State as it is, the State as it has been, the State as it ought to be. By contrast, as cooperation and division of labor develop in modern society, the needs of men multiply to include many nonessential things, such as friends, entertainment, and luxury goods.

So the individual must be subordinate to the state and not the reverse. It is in the society that an individual is surrounded and encompassed by culture, as a societal force. They owe their existence to the state. Still there are some English political thinkers, who believe that this forms the main part of our study.

On this point Aristotle follows Plato very strictly. This association is the end of those others and its nature is itself an end. Hitchner has also pointed out and rightly too that "the world around is clearly a political world.

Information about environment reaching as inputs in usual manner may enter the system too late. Long ago Aristotle had said that man was a social animal by nature and one who does not live in society was either a beast or God.Philosophy of mind explores the nature of the mind and its relationship to the body.

It is typified by disputes between dualism and materialism. In recent years this branch has become related to cognitive science.

Philosophy of human nature analyzes the unique characteristics of human beings, such as rationality, politics and culture. Although Rawls rejected the notion of a pre-social or pre-political state of nature, he argued that the basic features of a just society could best be discovered by considering the principles of government that would be accepted by a group of rational individuals who have been made ignorant of their positions in society (and thus also of the.


Man is by Nature a Political Animal: It is now clear that the state is a natural form of organization and by nature man has become the member of the state. Therefore, both state and individuals as its members are natural.

Aristotle does not stop here. Continuing his logic he has said that man is by nature a political animal. 4 Marx viewed a nation state as a collective power of which political parties rule on behalf of society by making rules and regulations in favour of the ruling class (Holmes et al,Hurst, ), based on rational decisions (Walters & Crook, ) and by the growing faith in science explaining reality (Hurst, ).

Process within or between political communities where public values are articulated, debated and prescribed. If we accept political science as a science in the same way that the natural sciences are, behavior must ultimately be describable by consistent causal laws, and yet, if human beings do not act predictably, or if their actions aren't.

Description and explanation of the major themes of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (–). life differs from life in the state of nature is his particular focus on the question of how authentic the life of man is in modern society.

In the state of nature, man is free to simply attend to his own natural needs and has few occasions to.

An analysis of the nature of man in society and the principles of a political process
Rated 0/5 based on 73 review